Royal arch bail on 112 and other charges

24 11 2022

Prachatai reports that Pornchai Yuanyee, Sinburi Saenkla, and Micky (full name withheld), activists accused of “the burning of a royal ceremonial arch in front of Ratchawinit School have been granted bail after months in prison.”

Clipped from Prachatai. Photo by Ginger Cat

They stand “accused of burning the royal ceremony arch during a protest on 19 September 2021. All three were charged with arson, destruction of property, and violation of the Emergency Decree.” Pornchai and Micky were also charged under Article 112 while “Sinburi was also accused of burning a traffic control box at the Nang Loeng intersection.”

All three had been refused bail for long periods: “Pornchai had been detained for 139 days, Sinburi for 107 days, and Micky for 50 days.”

It is reported: “Pornchai was arrested on 7 July, while Micky was denied bail on 4 October when he was indicted. Sinburi was denied bail when he went to Nang Loeng Police Station on 8 August after learning that there was an arrest warrant out for him.”

At a bail hearing on 31 October, the Criminal Court took three weeks to issue a ruling. Who were the judges consulting? On 22 November “the Court denied them bail on the grounds that their guarantor has no relations with them, and their proposed supervisors did not own the money used to post bail.”

After that, “Pornchai’s wife and father-in-law, Sinburi’s older sister, and Micky’s mother went to the Criminal Court after the Court said that the activists’ relatives must come to post bail for them and agree to be their supervisor. They were subsequently granted bail on a security of 100,000 baht each, which came from each relative’s personal fund instead of from the Will of the People Fund, a bail fund for pro-democracy activists and protesters.”

It seems the courts have found a way to defeat the Will of the People Fund.

Punishing the relatives, the court forced them to “agree that the Court may immediately confiscate the security if the activists break their bail conditions. All three supervisors will also be held responsible if one of the activists break their bail conditions.”

This is truly amazing, suggesting political interference in the judicial process or extreme royalism in the courts.

The three “must wear an electronic monitoring bracelet and must not leave their residence between 20.00 and 6.00, they must not repeat their offense, commit violence against an official, or destroy public property, and they are also not allowed to leave the country.”



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: