A little more than a month ago, The Economist published a brief observation on King Charles and his cancer. With another royal now being treated for cancer, other royals estranged, and another effectively banned for bad behavior, the British royal family is looking rather thin. Here’s the opinion piece:
Britain has always been interested in its kings’ bodies. Each age has had its own particular obsession. For Shakespeare, it was the king’s head—the mortal brow beneath the hollow crown—that fascinated. After the Restoration it was the king’s hand—Charles II was believed to be able to heal diseases by touch alone. Now national attention has turned to the state of Charles III’s health.
According to a statement from Buckingham Palace on February 5th, “a separate issue of concern was noted” while the king was being treated for an enlarged prostate. Subsequent tests “identified a form of cancer”. Quite which form has not been announced; a little royal distance remains. But when future historians come to chronicle the change from a “magical” monarchy, able to heal by touch alone, to the more humdrum mortal kind, this moment may feature: few things seem more mortal or less magical than a prostate.
In the past monarchies have been less willing to admit to frailty, as have their physicians. When George VI had his entire left lung removed in 1951 because of lung cancer, the public (and indeed the king himself) were told that this was due to “structural abnormalities”. When his grandfather, the high-living Edward VII, collapsed in Biarritz, it was at once entirely unsurprising—Edward smoked, drank and ate so abundantly that he couldn’t do up the bottom buttons on his waistcoat—and, at first, entirely unspoken about. An attempt to treat the king was made, including through the application of his favourite mistress. But even she failed to revive him.
The monarch’s mortality feels all the more salient when they come to the throne late. Elizabeth II ascended to the throne at the age of 25; when the congregation at her coronation sang “Long to reign over us” they could feel confident that she, with the pinchably plump flesh of youth, would do just that. At his coronation last year Charles—the longest-serving heir-apparent—was already 74.
A monarch is not a country incarnate, but they are not far off. If Elizabeth II—dutiful, stable and influential—embodied one era, it feels uncomfortably as though Charles III—also dutiful, but ageing and now battling ill health—might represent another. Then again, as Shakespeare makes clear, a king is also just a man. The crown might be bejewelled; the royal crest might sit on the press releases. But the king beneath is mortal, and increasingly open about it.
Where this is relevant for Thailand is in the thinness of the current royal family. The king’s favored consort was disappeared ages ago, Princess Bajrakitiyabha effectively ceased to exist months and months ago, the king’s sisters are strange in various ways, the king himself looks far less fit than he was even a couple of years ago, displaying the chubbiness that was his pre-military shape. His only acknowledged daughter still seen is scorned by many. Scorn doesn’t mean Princess Sirivannavari is ruled out as a possible queen, and she continues her PR campaigns.
In terms of succession, the only boys from the king are Prince Dipangkorn, widely seen as suffering some kind of intellectual incapacity. That said, intelligence has never trumped blood in royal matters. But the effort to rehabilitate at least one of the boys-now-men who were “de-royalled” a couple of decades ago looks like a desperate effort to overcome the succession blues.
Clipped from the Bangkok Post
Although he refused to acknowledge them, Vacharaesorn Vivacharawongse is married in the USA and with a couple of daughters, but seems to be willing to ditch them and return to Thailand in the hope of grabbing the crown.The Bangkok Post, which is usually a reliable palace outlet, has been reporting on Vacharaesorn’s latest visit, the longest so far, and scored a visit from the would-be prince-cum-king.
The Post’s picture, clipped her, shows Vacharaesorn, now sporting the appropriate lapel pins that somehow denote “loyalty.” Pins like this are also seen adorning the lapels and shirts of ministers, including gangsters and convicted drug traffickers.
In his interview, Vacharaesorn babbled on about his “connection” with Thailand (after being forced into exile almost three decades ago):
I am very happy that I now have an ID card and have officially become a Thai citizen. I felt like something was missing during the last 20 years… I am recognised as Mr Vacharaesorn on my ID card. I am proud of myself. I have made a life for myself through my own efforts, my patience and my own learning. This way, I gained more experience and strength…
He made his ambitions clear by stating:
Asked if he had any particular purpose for his return to Thailand, Mr Vacharaesorn said: “I only wanted to return to my homeland. This is the feeling of a person who left over 27 years ago…”.
“I came here privately. No one told me to come. I am not representing anyone. I don’t want to compete for anything … I have no resources, no power. I don’t have aspirations beyond providing value in my own capacity,” he said.
By saying that, everyone knows what he really means.
He went on to say that he now “intends to move from the US, where he is currently living, to Thailand and get permanent residency here — though several factors, including his career, must be taken into account.”
The ever supine Post feels the need to add:
His return after a nearly three-decade absence from Thailand might inevitably raise some suspicions about his motives, but he confirmed his intention was simply to see his homeland once more, witness the country’s changes and travel throughout the kingdom with no particular agenda.
No one believes denials that are affirmations.
None of this would be happening without palace involvement.
He gets ambiguous when referring to “family.” Who does he mean?: dad? little sister? the wife and kids in the US?:
“Everyone should help family members, the people around us, and contribute to society. I cannot say that I will be able to make big contributions or change society. But at the very least, I can do good things for myself, for my neighbours and for my family.”
If the public were as gullible as some think it is, and believe that Vacharaesorn was not told me to come, that he represents no one, and that he’s not competing for anything, then he’d look rather like a usurper backed by someone or some group competing for the current king’s power. We think that most unlikely.
Update: Pravit Rojanaphruk at Khaosod also covers the Vacharaesorn “mystery,” firing well deserved shots at the supine media and even at the opaque palace.